Would you like to know what is the real-time status of the European air traffic network? The delay situation or the events that are affecting the network? Then why not go to Eurocontrol’s Network Operations Portal: https://www.cfmu.eurocontrol.int/PUBPORTAL/gateway/spec/index.html

This portal is made up of a number of portlets each giving a distinct piece of information ranging from a map illustrating the network situation to flight and delay situation graphs, to lists of events that will affect the network, to headline news on the subject. A number of other links will lead you to other resources such as the European AIS Database [EAD] or to Eurocontrol’s e-conferencing tool [which only allows authorised access]

Using the tabs towards the upper part of the screen, one can move from the real time situation [tactical tab] to what will happen in a few hours time [pre-tactical] to the plans and expectations in the future [strategic]. One can also see what happened at a given point in history by accessing the post-operations tab.

There are two versions of the NOP, a public version, to which I provided the link, and a restricted version for air traffic management stakeholder usage [e.g. air traffic flow management cells, control centres, airlines, airport operators, military users, etc.

Apart from providing a wealth of information, the NOP provides a transparency of the European air traffic situation that very few other industries do in fact show. This shows clearly the ambition of the industry to keep improving its performance in a collaborative way.<-->

Share on Facebook

As I am writing, 47 days are left before the flight adherence days take place.

The flight adherence days are a European trial that will take place across Europe on the 29^th and 30^th of September 2010. This initiative means that all flights will adhere to the planned cruising level for any portion of the flight as recorded on Field 15 of their flight plan.

The effect this will have on the network will be studied in comparison with the usual situation. The benefits will be considered and will help to think about further ways on how to improve the network performance.

There is a web site dedicated to this initiative which is very interactive and which answers to a number of very interesting and frequently asked questions like whether a controller can still give direct routes during the trials [find out the answer yourself by going to this link: http://www.adherencedays.com/ ]

I close with the rules of the trial:

“Pilots and ATC should not request/allocate an alternative level except in the event of an emergency, weather avoidance or to achieve separation.”

So for the success of this initiative, let us hope that these days will not be characterised by generalised thunderstorm or clear air turbulence

Share on Facebook

In order to introduce the world of ATC to potential air traffic control trainees, the Deutsche Flugsicherung [DFS] have put a number of games / tests online for free.

These tests are fun to do and give a good insight of some of the skills one needs to become an air traffic controller including:

• Continously splitting attention over a number of task – whilst maintaining an overall picture.
• Extrapolation of spacial position and conflict resolution through turning [vectoring] of aircraft.
• Memory
• Appreciation of left and right turns
• Etc.

Have a look at these games and tests, I am sure you’ll like them.

My favourite is Pushing Thin [comes with an addiction warning]

Well done to DFS. Great inititive and great tests!

Click here

If anyone know of other similar games and test, please share with the rest of us by commenting to this post.

Thanks!

Share on Facebook

Image embedded from yahoo news

Towards the end of March, one of Iceland’s volcanoes, the Eyjafjallajokull, started erupting. Apart from lava and flooding from ice and snow sitting on top, it has put a biq quantity of volcanic ash into the air.

This volcanic ash is of danger to aircraft. For more information on volcanic ash and aviation, please go here:

http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Volcanic_Ash

Based on the guidelines of the International Civil Aviation Organisation normal air traffic control services cannot be provided to flights in airspaces affected by volcanic ash.

Eurocontrol is coordinating with local Air Navigation Service providers to ensure safety and to mitigate, as much as possible the situation. Here is the press release.

Charts indicating the presence of volcanic ash are regularly updated and presented by met offices and observatory units to aviation.

Share on Facebook

Towards the end of 2009, EUROCONTROL released a Phraseology Database called ‘Say Again’.

Image from Eurocontrol's website

This database [to whose development I participated] provides you with a engine which searches through out ATC phraseology key words. Once you find the phrase you are looking for, you can then retrieve the standard ICAO syntax for the phrase. You are also provided with an example, both written and sound, the context within which the phrase should be used and its relation with other phrases.

Screen shot from Say Again

A special thanks also goes to LFV, Sweden, as a good number of examples originate from its training school.

Goto Eurocontrol’s Training Zone and search for ‘Say Again’ in the course catalogue.

Share on Facebook

Three years ago, Eurocontrol set to develop training material to sensiblise air traffic controllers on the risks that can occure during position handovers and to provide suggestions and tools to minimise these risks.

In preparation for the development of this training material, a research study was conducted to identify the factors affecting handovers and takeovers. The document referred to here reports the findings of this research. It includes the following sections:

• A literature review including reports on the study performed by the National Air Traffic Services Ltd. UK (NATS) on handovers and the establishment of best practices based on this study;
• Interviews of Safety Experts which summarises the interviews on handover-related safety hazards conducted with the safety managers of two Air Navigation Services Providers (ANSPs);
• Training Material Review, the existing pedagogic material relative to position handovers in Europe is reviewed and analysed (prior to the Web-based training on factors dealing with handover/takeover produced by EUROCONTROL in 2006);
• Identification of the Main Handover-related Safety Issues’, provides, based on the information collected during the study, a preliminary list of the main handover-related safety issues that should be addressed to improve handover processes and
• Key findings of this preliminary study on handover

It also contains  a number of checklists whcih were in use in different European ANSPs

It can be found here

Enjoy the read.

Share on Facebook

What is the ceiling or range of an Airbus 380? What is the MTOW of a Boeing 737-800? What is the expected performance of an aircraft? How does it look like? It is all freely available on the Eurocontrol Aircraft Performance database for 300 aircraft types.

Eurocontrol aircraft performance database

Share on Facebook

Will they land?

Share on Facebook

Have you hugged a controller today?

Here is something dedicated to you, controller on your international day: 20th of October 2009

To the one who is safety conscious

To the one who is professional

To the one who expedites

To the one who clears

To the one who listens

To the one who stresses

To the one who needs to work around the clock

To the one who is on the sharp edge

But also

To the one who is [generally] highly paid

To the one who has [generally] a secure job

To the one who can ask for more

To the one who asks for more [money]

To the one who gets to think he’s god

To the one who thinks the others are all wrong

To the one who takes it fore granted to give orders

To the one who falls into complacency and disinterest

And

To the one whose job is in constant change

To the one who gets told: Your job will not exist [in 20 years' time]

To the one who needs to stay competent

To the one who gets told what to do by people who don’t know what he does

To the one and only

To the controller

The controller is a person like the rest of us. He is neither black nor white, neither fully good nor fully bad. But like the rest of us he is a human with strengths and weaknesses. He is a person with a mission: And a noble one: to participate in getting the flying public safely and expeditiously from A to B. And for this we love him and we thank him…

Have you hugged a controller today?  If you haven’t you should.  Hug them to tell her that you love them and what they do and also to comfort them in their weakness…

Share on Facebook

It has been a long time since I last wrote on this blog. I thought no one was reading it, but I was wrong. So here I am again!

This time I have been thinking about the training progression for student air traffic controllers and wondering whether it is the most efficient manner to train students.

Surely it follows a logical flow: It starts with mainly theory and gradually evolves into practice. The logical theory behind this is that a student needs to know the theory before he or she can practice.

But is this efficient?

What I mean is that: is teaching theory before practice an efficient way?

The major difficulty and failure area for student air traffic controllers lies with the skill capacity needed to control aircraft. A significant number of students, even after sophisticated screening during selection seem not to have the required capacity to control aircraft. Equally  true, ATC training seems not to have yet found the right methods to teach anyone who is willing and motivated to become an air traffic controller the necessary skills to do the job. An innate level of the skill set is still a pre-requirement.

Since the difficulty is with the skill, why do we wait a few months before we start training for this area?

Is this not a waste of time?

Why should we not be able to discover at an earlier stage whether or not the student has what it takes to make it?

Why do we waste a few months of our resources and money, and of the students time when we could do it earlier?

So the question is: is a few months worth of theoretical training necessary before the student can start to practice?

For me the answer is no.

In a simulated environment, one could easily create a basic set of rules [that do not condradict the real ones] that could be quickly taught to the students for them to start practicing. For example, the full phraseology is not necessary, basic commands such as climb, descend, turn, proceed, etc. could be taught in a few hours.
Similarly the complexity of route structures, letters of agreement, advanced procedures, the encoding and decoding of route points and location indicators, etc. could also come later. We could easily teach students that this aircraft represented by this symbol needs to go from A to B via C and D, it will enter the sector at Level 250 and needs to exit at Level 300, etc. Students would need to keep 1000 feet separation between aircraft and 5nm between two which have less than this vertical separation minimum

The theory would then come after an initial period where in the student would have demonstrated that most probably [one can never be 100% sure, but at least there is a better indication than with our current training path] he or she has the innate skill necessary to successfully complete training.

I think if we did this, we would be saving ourselves money and time.

We would also be saving the students’ time.

Share on Facebook