Jan
29
2008

Computer Based Assessment Tools

The following is an extract from an article I am writing to inform trainers about assessment tools:

Assessment tools are those tools which allow trainers and assessors to: develop, manage and administer assessments, as well as to collect assessment results and to compile statistics based on a number of parameters.
Assessment tools could be used both in distance and in face to face modes.  The advantages of using an assessment tool over using pen and paper are manifold:
Firstly an assessment tool enables the user to manage the assessment questions.  This means that all the questions pertaining to a particular subject are collected in a question data bank.  A number of tags could be added to these questions, for example, in which subject they could be used, the level of difficulty, etc.
Secondly performing assessment tools allow users to define questions from an extensive set of question types, such as multiple choice questions, drag and drops, etc.
Thirdly these tools allow the definition of assessment parameters, for example: Generate different assessments for the same subject but keeping the same level of difficulty, randomise the answers, e.g. in multiple choice, so that copying answers and cheating become more difficult, generate assessments to be used for training purposes whilst others to be used for the summative exam, defining the duration of assessments [per assessment or per question], etc.
Fourthly assessment tools usually come with reporting suites that enables the assessor to get advance reporting by: individual student performance, group performance, session performance, particular questions which posed a problem, performance of the same assessment over different groups of students, number of times a question from the question bank was used, etc.
Fifthly, assessment tools can also be used to generate surveys and questionnaires and collect their results, such as for example, end of training feedback questionnaires.
Assessment tools in general are still limited in the way they handle free text assessment types.  Even though a number of them have features which enable automatic handling of these types of questions using certain keywords and semantics, in general the performance of such features is still not up to the level required by most assessments.  What they never the less offer is the possibility of an assessor to score the free text answer and then allow for the score and comments to be recorded within the tool for reporting and analysis purposes.
Assessment tools can improve the development, delivery and management of assessments however some generic best practices for assessments are still valid whether the exam is delivered in pen and paper format or over a computer:
Having a good question base for a particular subject.  The less questions there are, the more the assessment become repetitive and the less ‘formative’ instances can be created – where the students can do practice assessment drills and learn form their mistakes.
Having the possibility of delivering assessments online does not automatically mean that the assessment is secure: In a face to face environment, a proctor supervises that no cheating takes place during exams.  Even if advanced security features enable the more advanced assessment tools to be used to administer exams in distance mode, the cheating factor is still important.  Decide on the importance and criticality of the assessment before deciding on the mode [distance or in a class].  A class exam can be delivered using a computer, thus enabling all the other advantages that an assessment tool can offer.
Assess the validity and reliability of an assessment before delivering it.  By validity it is meant the degree the assessment actually assesses the student on the knowledge of the subject officially being tested.  Reliability means the degree that different sessions of the assessment or the assessment being delivered to different people will result in similar performances for similar knowledge.  This means for example, that two versions of the same assessment have the same level of difficulty and that the assessment does not discriminate for gender or age or other skill that has nothing to do with the assessment.
Examples of assessment tools are:
Perception by Questionmark [www.questionmark.com]
Question Tools by Question Tools [www.questiontools.com]

Written by Max in: Training | Tags: ,
Jan
23
2008

Are you a non E-learning expert but who needs to design and develop computer based training?

A team of e-learning developers working in different ATM training organisations have written a set of guidelines on the development of web based training material based on their experience and knowledge.The document is called: Best practices for e-learning developers in ATM and can be downloaded by following this link:

This document is divided into four main chapters:

  1. instructional design,
  2. human factors [meaning factors relating to behaviour and to other human aspects that need to be taken into account by an e-learning developer to successfully fulfill his/her role],
  3. project management and
  4. technical aspects.

The chapter on instructional design is of particular interest to the training designer as it explores items such as:

  • When should e-learning be used?
  • How is e-learning best used?
  • Getting to know the learner
  • Learning styles
  • Considerations on the adult learner
  • Considering the task: a focus on ATC
  • The design process
  • From subject matter to interactive matter Â
  • Navigation and Look and Feel
  • Methods and media to be used in e-learning when teaching: skills, data retention and knowledge

Etc. There are also items in the human factors and in the project management chapters that would be of interest to the training designer.

Written by Max in: Training | Tags: , , ,
Jan
09
2008

Content management systems

One of the greatest assets a training school has is its training material.

This training material is precious for many reasons.  To name some, because they are the tangible translation of the knowledge that the training school is ready to transfer to its clients and because the training institution has paid its staff, or other persons to develop it over time.

But how many times do we see that this training material is badly managed and that for example various instructors do not manage to find each others work or else that the institution has a problem with maintaining its work and with continuity with training material improvement.

A number of solutions exist that help manage training material.  But non are magical wands.  The institution needs to discipline itself to tag the material and organise it in such a way that it can be easily found, re used, improved and published in a number of formates [e.g. online, printed, SCORMED, over presentations, etc.]

The training institutions who figure this out, i.e. the fair combination between a good technological system, good processes to manage the content, dedicated instructors that will create, maintain and improve content and a balance between management of content and its useability will be the ones which will have a competitive advantage over the others…

Written by Max in: Training | Tags:

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes
The content of this blog reflects the sole opinion of the author and by no automatic means that of his employer